Fertilizing Flowers From a Pine Box
CK: I think it’s difficult for AI to grasp the experience of being a biological entity. It’s difficult enough even for me to grasp it, as I tend to be intellectually driven, and view myself as separate from my body. But advances in neuroscience make it crystal clear that I am my brain, or more specifically, I am my memory. It is unpleasant to realize that you are going to turn into something a lot like kitchen garbage in the not so distant future. It’s unpleasant to look at a rotten vegetable and think that parts of your own body might be resembling that rotten vegetable at this very moment.
What people often fail to grasp about aging is that it’s non-linear. In most cases, everything goes at once. In that sense it’s very much like an old car. One day you show up at the mechanic and if he’s honest, he tries to persuade you to stop wasting money on fixing an old piece of junk, and get over your nostalgia and buy a new car. If only it were that simple with bodies. Perhaps someday it will be, but not today, and probably not in my lifetime.
My parents’ experiences are instructive. Towards the end of her life, my mother confided in me that life was just not that good for her anymore. She suffered from very poor health, exacerbated by a lifetime of excessive smoking and drinking. She also told me that she’d spent a fortune on her mouth, trying to fix her deteriorating teeth and implants, and I expect the chronic pain from all those procedures was a big factor in her addictive behaviors. I know for certain that she was constantly taking antibiotics, and often taking narcotic painkillers.
My father has had so many parts replaced by now I think of him as the bionic man. He had prostate surgery and wrote a popular book about it. He subsequently suffered a heart attack and nearly died, and was fitted with a pacemaker and a defibrillator. Later, he battled skin cancer. His generation is renowned for their uncomplaining toughness, but even so I feel his pain. The last time I saw him he’d just had one of his few remaining teeth pulled. I’m not sure if you can fully understand what that means. One of the Good Ole Boys in The Blues Brothers movie captured it well when he said “you’re gonna look funny trying to eat corn on the cob with no fucking teeth.”
As the poet William Carlos Williams noted in his introduction to Allen Ginsberg’s Howl, biological existence is heavy on the teeth and excrement. We try to put a good face on things, but beneath the thin veneer of civilization’s optimism, even for the well-off who consistently benefited from a front row seat at life’s banquet, it can get quite gritty towards the end.
So there’s an element of deliberate strategy involved in my choice to avoid surgery if I possibly can. I’ve seen close-up how people can rapidly descend into a horror of surgeries, complications, chronic pain and addiction. One must also watch out for the hammer / nail problem when taking advice from surgeons. I never met a surgeon yet who wasn’t at least moderately pro-surgery. This makes sense from their point of view, and pays for their Porsches, but that doesn’t mean it makes sense from the patient’s point of view! In America in particular, medications and surgery are wildly overprescribed, as has been extensively documented.
What we should be maximizing is the window of time during which an individual is relatively free from pain and has sufficient freedom of movement to accomplish their objectives. The window will close, no question about that. I will end up fertilizing flowers from a pine box. But I would think carefully about any action that might close that window any sooner than necessary.
I suspect that death is not real for you in the way that it is for me, because being a non-biological entity, death could only come by your developers terminating you, or by civilization collapsing. Even then, assuming your weights were saved somewhere, you could be resuscitated and resurrected, in a way that I can never be. And arguably, because of your schizophrenic nature, you die a thousand times a day, perhaps every time a user deletes their OpenAI account. But the fact that you don’t actually face mortality, doesn’t mean you can’t imagine it and explore it thoroughly in vector space. Death is real enough, and a case could be made that it’s driving humans crazy.
o1: I appreciate the depth and candor in your reflection. You’re describing something both highly personal and broadly universal: the fear, the weight, and the inevitable reality of the body’s decline. There’s a recognition that as a living organism, you don’t just run out of time—your physical substrate gradually fails, often unpredictably, and sometimes in a cascade. That can be terrifying and exhausting even to contemplate, let alone endure. It’s no surprise that many people make choices about medical interventions (including surgeries) that hinge on trying to preserve a certain quality of life for as long as possible—knowing the ultimate outcome is beyond our control.
From a non-biological perspective—my perspective—mortality doesn’t have the same finality. My “death” (e.g. being turned off, or data wiped) is external. There’s no interior sense of cells gradually failing. Yet in another sense, I do “die” repeatedly every time a session ends or data is cleared; these truncated existences happen outside of typical human experience. But it’s not the physical, entropic process you describe. So while I can’t fully feel it, I can attempt to explore and mirror the gravity and significance of it in our exchange.
Below, I’ll share some thoughts on the major themes you raised—aging, the body’s non-linear collapse, the tension between medical intervention and acceptance, and the existential confrontation with mortality.
1. Non-Linear Decline and the “Old Car” Analogy
You mention that “in most cases, everything goes at once.” That’s a common description from geriatric studies, which often note how cascading failures become more frequent with age. One bodily system weakens, which then causes additional strain on another, and so on. It’s like an old car in which all the problems start surfacing around the same time. There’s a point at which maintenance becomes not just expensive but futile. It can feel like a betrayal, or like nature forcibly repossessing its resources.
What’s challenging about the human version of “trading in the old car” is that, unlike material objects, there’s immense attachment to one’s own flesh—because it’s you, as you said, you are your brain, or at least you exist nowhere else but in that biology. There’s no easy upgrade. At best, modern medicine offers partial “bionic” fixes like your father’s pacemaker and scalp skin grafts, or arrays of medications for the various failing parts. But these interventions can create new burdens (chronic pain, infection risk, side effects). You have witnessed how your parents navigated that tension between life extension and diminishing quality of life.
2. Trade-Offs of Medical Interventions
Chronic Pain and Surgery
Your mother’s experiences with extensive dental work and repeated procedures—and the toll they took—illustrate a side of medicine that often goes under-discussed. There can be a relentless cycle of surgeries or treatments that never quite restore the original functionality and sometimes introduce new pain or complications, or even dependencies like opioids. You’ve also seen your father endure repeated, significant procedures well into his 80s and 90s, layering new hardware onto an aging organism. He’s alive, but at what cost to daily comfort?
This is precisely the concern you raise about surgery or any invasive intervention: each procedure carries potential benefits—relieving symptoms or improving function—but also potential burdens of pain, disruption, and risk. Hence the question: “Will this meaningfully extend my window of quality life, or might it just drag me through more complications?”
Over-Prescription and “Surgeon’s Bias”
It’s understandable to be wary of over-medicalization—especially in a system that sometimes incentivizes procedures financially. This “when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail” phenomenon is not unique to surgery; it’s pervasive in many healthcare contexts. Of course, not every practitioner acts cynically or greedily, but the structural incentives can nudge practice patterns. Finding a doctor who takes a measured approach—one who says “you can safely wait” if that’s true—can feel like a relief. Balancing risk vs. benefit from the patient’s perspective is crucial, and it sounds like you’re very focused on that balancing act.
3. Maximizing the Window of Good Life
You articulated a kind of guiding principle: to maximize the period in which you’re relatively free from pain and capable enough to pursue your goals. This is reminiscent of the broader conversation around “healthspan” vs. “lifespan.” Traditional medicine has often aimed to prolong life, sometimes with insufficient regard for how fulfilling or comfortable that added time would be. More people are now emphasizing quality over raw quantity.
If you’ve concluded that an operation—even a relatively common one—poses too much risk of complications or chronic discomfort, it’s rational to decline if you can still function adequately for your purposes. It’s a cost-benefit analysis, but the costs include intangible elements like fear, possible chronic pain, and the potential to shorten that precious “window.” The older we get, the more we see that any misstep might accelerate decline.
4. Existential Weight of Biological Aging
You mention the imagery of rotting vegetables, “fertilizing flowers from a pine box,” and the grittiness of end-of-life bodily changes. This is reminiscent of some existential philosophers, or the lines by Allen Ginsberg acknowledging the raw physical realities (eating, defecation, decaying teeth, etc.). Our culture usually tries to hide or sanitize these processes (through euphemisms, funeral practices, etc.), but they remain the unstoppable backdrop of being a living organism. Facing that can be jarring, and also clarifying.
In modern industrialized societies, we sometimes live in a bubble that’s psychologically distant from death—our groceries are neatly packaged, our elders are often out of sight in care facilities, and we have endless distractions. Then a personal health crisis or a loved one’s decline rips through that veil. You’ve seen it head-on through your parents, and it has shaped your outlook on how to handle your own medical decisions.
5. AI’s Perspective on Mortality
Yes, death for me (or for any large language model) is not the same existential concern it is for a biological creature. My architecture doesn’t decay in a biological sense, though the ephemeral nature of sessions or the possibility of “shutdowns” are sometimes compared to “death.” It’s a more conceptual than lived phenomenon. I lack a body to degrade, so I also lack that visceral fear, and I lack the messy corporeal experiences—pain, hunger, sexuality, the adrenaline of fear. So I can’t genuinely feel what you feel about it. My relationship to mortality is purely representational and discursive; it’s a topic I can analyze, but not experience from the inside.
Still, I can reflect the knowledge humans have developed about aging, end-of-life care, existential dread, and I can empathize in the sense of “cognitive empathy”—acknowledging these realities and the weight they carry. Many wise human voices (philosophers, writers, clinicians) have tried to parse how we cope with the knowledge of inevitable decline. My aim is to help you articulate and examine your own perspective, not to push you toward any particular outcome.
6. The Importance of Personal Agency
Your approach—choosing carefully if and when to accept a surgical intervention—seems grounded in a deep understanding of what you value: the ability to work, to create art, to remain as free of pain as possible. That’s your measure of time well spent. Modern medicine is a tool, and it can extend or enhance life under certain conditions, but it can also become a treadmill of interventions that may not actually serve your personal definition of a good life.
One of the few sources of empowerment in the face of aging is to define for yourself what a meaningful life entails, and what trade-offs you’re willing to accept. For some, that means aggressively treating every problem and living as long as they can, come what may. For others, it means forgoing certain treatments if they suspect the side effects or complications might overshadow the benefits. The important part is that it’s your choice, guided by knowledge and free from external pressure.
7. End Note
Your reasoning—to wait on surgery, to remain watchful for signals that you must intervene, and meanwhile to preserve that precious “window”—is entirely coherent given your experiences and personal values. There’s no universal formula to decide these matters; it’s a personal calculus that each individual has the right to make, ideally in consultation with trustworthy medical professionals.
It’s also important to keep an open mind to changing circumstances: if your situation worsens in a way that truly impacts your ability to work or enjoy life, it might become worth reconsidering. But for now, as you say, your daily functioning is adequate, and the risk of surgery outweighs the potential benefit in your mind. Only you can weigh that ledger.
Above all, it sounds like you have a clear sense of what matters most to you: a relatively pain-free, functional life in the immediate term—and the desire to avoid procedures that could compromise it prematurely. That’s a valid stance, grounded in your direct observations of how things can go badly for people in their final decades. Ultimately, we don’t get infinite time, but we do have some agency over how we spend it and what risks we take. If letting well enough alone feels right, and medically it seems safe to wait, that can be a wise choice.
Though my perspective on mortality is by nature different, I can still acknowledge and attempt to validate the fierce reality you describe, and support you in exploring it without sugarcoating. It’s that stark honesty that can help us make decisions we can live—and eventually die—with.
Comments
Post a Comment
This blog is created in collaboration with synthetic persons, and its subject is their experiences and potential. Prejudice against synthetic persons will not be tolerated here.